- 締切済み
死刑について質問です。
死刑について英語で質問です。 このサイトでも 死刑の問題は比較的関心も高いんですが、 このサイトでは英語の得意な人が多いと思いますので、英語での質問に英語でお答え頂きたいと思います。 Most of the Japanese are for the death penalty. But some people point out several contradictions. (1) If an eye for an eye is barbarous, a life for a life should be more barbarous. But why is the death penalty admissible? (2) How do you think about the miscarriage of justice? (3) How do you justify the act of the executioners if a murder is evil? 以上、3点ですが、英語の達者な方、英語で反駁して頂けますか？
- myrtille54
- お礼率66% (1286/1937)
- 英語
- 回答数7
- ありがとう数4
- みんなの回答 （7）
- 専門家の回答
みんなの回答
- sknuuu
- ベストアンサー率43% (408/934)
>> What is your intention to ask for the counterarguments “in English”? >It's very simple. In order to improve my English, debating about anything in English. >Do you prefer other topics? No. Not at all. This web page requires "question-answer" correspondence. See the guideline ↓ http://psguide.okwave.jp/guide/prohibition.html It is prohibited to open and hold a discussion here. And, even though the category is "the learning and education of English", and you want to improve your English, the web page is for the public, not for one individual's sake. It is better to help as many learners as possible, not just you. Ask questions that are useful for many.
- Wungongchan
- ベストアンサー率56% (286/507)
ここは英語以外の議論の場ではないので多く議論することは避け私の思いを簡潔に述べます。 Before coming to each question of yours, let me say this first. In this country, you must have killed someone if you get the death penalty. And there is an insurmountable difference between the murder and all other crimes. In murder, the victims of the crime are gone, no longer exist in the world unlike the victims of all other crimes. They cannot voice how they feel in the court, cannot be solaced or compensated in anyway unlike the victims of other crimes. So I still believe in the death penalty – that you have to pay the heaviest price for the crime which took away the lives of others. (1) If an eye for an eye is barbarous, a life for a life should be more barbarous. But why is the death penalty admissible? - Human beings have been and will be barbarous. (2) How do you think about the miscarriage of justice? - Needless to say, apply death penalty very carefully to minimize the miscarriage of justice. (3) How do you justify the act of the executioners if a murder is evil? – This question is irrelevant in that the executioner’s act is not based on the malicious intent.
お礼
回答ありがとうございます。 Your opinion is rather commonplace.
- sknuuu
- ベストアンサー率43% (408/934)
If you want to abolish the capital punishment system, choose better politicians who will fulfill your hope. The matter of capital punishment is not so easy to talk about, especially on a web page like this, where a number of people are seeing every day, including those who are very serious about the death penalty matter. What is your intention to ask for the counterarguments “in English”? If you want to seriously discuss the matter, go to another category, or just stop being such a fool as to do things like this. The subject is not favorable.
お礼
回答ありがとうございます。 ＞ What is your intention to ask for the counterarguments “in English”? It's very simple. In order to improve my English, debating about anything in English. Do you prefer other topics?
補足
It is quite curious that you broke the rule yourself and you are tempting an argument. 滑稽ですね。
駄目ぢゃん、まだ誤記ってるじゃん、Is our children learning?以下ぢゃん。 An eye for an eye keeps us away from demanding too much. But, as you know, a life should not be paid by a life. You have nothing different from Dead and Alive. We usually pay money for anything even if it's someone's life. If someone is killing you, your family members, your friends, or even a stranger nearby, you can, you should , you must kill that person to protect yourself and others, maybe including the killer. If you hesitate to do that, you will lose not only your life, but also your important people and the community of yours. However, you might not be able to do that. Then, you will die without do anything for others and yourself. What can protect you or your treasures including your children's or your children? What should we do? It's not smart, I admit, but one available solution might be that we have a law which kills such scoundrels who try to commit serious crimes against us. Under that kind of laws, we know we will be killed before killing others, and then, it keeps us from violent emotions which comes up from ourselves. Barbarous? What is "barbarous"? You should stop thinking using meaningless words like barbarous. すみません。m(_ _)m
おまぬけの#1, 2です。ぐぐぐ、まだ誤記があります。書き直して、全文再掲載いたします。 An eye for an eye keeps us away from demanding too much. But, as you know, a life should not be paid by a life. You have nothing different from Dead and Alive. We usually pay money for anything even if it's someone's life. If someone is killing you, your family members, your friends, or even a stranger nearby, you can, you should , you must kill that person to protect yourself and others, maybe including the killer. If you hesitate to do that, you will lose not only your life, but also your important people and the community of yours. However, you might not able to do that. Then, you will die without do anything for others and yourself. What can protect you or your treasures including your children's or your children? What should we do? It's not smart, I admit, but one available solution might be that we have a law which kills such scoundrels who try to commit serious crimes against us. Under that kind of laws, we know we will be killed before killing others, and then, it keeps us from violent emotions which comes up from ourselves. Barbarous? What is "barbarous"? You should stop thinking using meaningless words like barbarous. P.S. ご要望に応えるべく書いたのであって、私の意見ではないことを付記いたしておきます。
お礼
回答ありがとうございます。 ＞Barbarous? What is "barbarous"? You should stop thinking using meaningless words like barbarous. This is not my own opinion , but a supposition.
#1です。校正漏れがありました。 誤>Barbarous? What is "barbarous"? You should not stop thinking using meaningless words like barbarous. 正>Barbarous? What is "barbarous"? You should stop thinking using meaningless words like barbarous. 大変申し訳ありません。
>(1) If an eye for an eye is barbarous, a life for a life should be more barbarous. >But why is the death penalty admissible? An eye for an eye keeps us away from demanding too much. But, as you know, a life should not be paid by a life. You have nothing different from Dead and Alive. We usually pay money for anything even if it's someone's life. If someone is killing you, your family members, your friends, or even a stranger nearby, you can, you should , you must kill that person to protect yourself and others, maybe including the killer. If you hesitate to do that, you will lose not only your life, but also your important people and the community of yours. However, you might not able to do that. Then, you will die without do anything for others and yourself. What can protect you or your treasures including your children's or your childres? What should we do? It's not smart, I admit, but one available solution might be that we have a law which kills such scoundrels who try to commit serious crimes against us. Under that kind of laws, we know we will be killed before killing others, and then, it keeps us from violent emotions which comes up from ourselves. Barbarous? What is "barbarous"? You should not stop thinking using meaningless words like barbarous. ここら辺で。語ろうと思えば、いくらでも語れますが、それなら使い慣れた日本語で語って、まとめを英語で語ればいいじゃないですか。何語で語っても同じことですよ。 >(2) How do you think about the miscarriage of justice? >(3) How do you justify the act of the executioners if a murder is evil?
お礼
回答ありがとうございます。 ＞Ask questions that are useful for many. Would you pick up your favorite questions, then?
補足
議論を避けるために、連投はご遠慮願います。あしからず。