文法や表現のおかしなところを指摘していただけると
ライティングの勉強中なのですが、添削してもらえる人がいなくて困っています。
文法や表現のおかしなところを指摘していただけると幸いです。
The passage says that "success career” means fainancial stability and material affluence and if you want them, you had better go to field in a medicine or in a low. On the other hand, in the lecture, the speaker says that career in a medicine or in a low isn’t need for good life.
First, while in the passage money is important factor for success, the professor pointed out that money isn’t necessarrily important. So, you needn’t go to fields on a medicine or a low, or reputable university, according to the professor.
Second, there is also difference about how you should choice major between the writer and the speaker. The writer insists that you should carefully consider best major and focus in the university, but the speaker recommended that you choice major or focus depending on your interesting.
Finally, the professor critisized the students who only study in the universuty life, which is recommend in the passage, and insist that it is imprtant for students to experience a variety of activity.
In the conclusion, there are three different points about success career between the writer and the profssor.
お礼
回答ありがとうございます！！ そうですね！そっか～ necessary以下で形容詞句の後置修飾ですもんね！いや～ナルホド！！すっきりしました～！！