英語の問題お願いします
「←」は自分の解答です。よろしくお願いします。内容自体は面白いです。
Two Harvard psychologists,Nalini Ambady and Hobert Rosenthal,did an interesting experiment.
[[[Ambady had originally wanted to study what makes teaching work well.]]]-下線部A
She suspected that nonverbal cues―body language and so on―were important.To test this,
she used some videotapes that had been made of a group of Harvard teachers.She
planned to show silent video clips of the teachers to a group of people and have them
rate how good they thought the teaching was.
Ambady wanted to use one-minute clips of each teacher.Unfortunately,the tapes showed the teachers commmunicating with students. [[[That was a problem,]]]-下線部2
because if students were seem in the clips,it might somehow change the raters'oponions of the teachers.
Then Ambady looked at the tapes again and decided she could get ten-second clips of teachers in which no students were seen.
She did the study with those ten-second
clips.Based on just ten seconds, the raters judged the teachers,answering fifteen
questions on the paper.
Okay,if you have to judge someone from a ten-second video clip,you can.However,you probably wouldn't expect that such a judgement could be useful.
Ambady repeated the experiment with five-second clips of the same teachers.
Another group of raters judged them.Their judgements were almost the same as the rating of the people who saw the ten-second clips.
Ambady then had another group watch two-second clips of the same teachers.
Again,the ratings were basically the same.
[[[The shocking thing]]]-下線部3 was this,Ambady compared the video-clip ratings to ratings made by the students of the same
teachers at the end of the semester.The students knew the professors much better than anyone possibly could from a silent video vlip.
However,―the students' ratings were in close agreement with those of the people who
saw only the videos.Perfect strangers' opinions of a teacher,based on a silent two-second video,were nearly the
same as those of students who had sat in classes all through the semester.
It looks like people make [[[a map judgement]]]-下線部4 of a person within two seconds of meeting
him or her―a judgement not based on anything the person says.
下線部2の理由として最も適当なもの
ア 学生がビデオに写っていると評価者の評価に影響するかもしれないから←？
イ 学生にビデオに写ってもらうと評価者から文句がでるかもしれないから
ウ 学生の担任だとわかると評価者の意見が左右されるかもしれないから
エ ビデオに映りたがる学生がいると評価者の邪魔になるかもしれないから
第4段落[Okay,if you have to judge] から第6段落[Ambady then had]に述べられている実験内容を以下のようにまとめたい。
空所に20字以内の日本語を補え。ただし読点も字数に数える。
別々のグループに対して、第一段落と同じ実験を＿＿＿＿＿＿行う。←徐々に実験時間を減らしながら？
下線部3の具体的内容を以下のようにまとめたい。空所に15字以内の日本語を補え、ただし読点も字数に数える。
教授を評価する場合、＿＿＿＿＿＿は関係ないということ。←その人の顔以外は？
本文の内容から、下線部4の具体例として正しいものを下のア～オのうちから2つ選び、記号で答えよ。ただし解答の順序は問わない。
ア 長く付き合うといい人だとわかったい
イ 話の内容のよい人はやっぱり賢いことがわかるね。
ウ 電話の方が相手の性格がよくわかるんだ
エ 会ってすぐにいいお医者さんだって思ったよ。←
オ 音を消したテレビを見ていても、この人の演説は説得力があるってわかる。←
お礼
回答ありがとうございました！ センテンスはくだらないのですが、おかげでabideが覚えられました。