先ほど質問した文章の続きです。

質問

先ほど質問した文章の続きです。
引き続き、翻訳していただきたいです。 お願いいたします。

Clark attributes the HA’s enthusiasm for his company’s technology in part to the low false alarm rate offered by radar.”Radar is not affected by rain,fog,dust,smoke or even bright sunlight,which can be a problem for video-based detection systems at tunnel portals,”he says.”Also,our radar quite different-even from other raders.Ours scans up and down the surface of the road and it covers the whole road,whereas a single-point system loses any vehicle that stops after that point.We offer a longer detection range,which ultimately means that fewer sensors are needed.”Clark views his system as being supplementary to video coverage however.”Most operators will still want to see an incident for themselves but using radar sensors to detect that incident means they’ll need fewer cameras.”
Unsurprisingly for company with a background in security,Navtech Rader is now picking up ITS contracts in regions such as the Middle East.”We’ve been working on aproject in Kuwait for which we’ve sold a radar-based incident detection system for asecurity application,”Clark explains.”It’s being.used todetect incidents next to some oil field infrastructure.This particular part of the perimeter is a multilane highway and a single rader covers the hard shoulder,the lanes in the fast carriageway,the median strip and the lanes in the second carriageway.It also provides control massages to a pan/tilt/zoom(PTZ)camera so that any incidents it detects can be viewed by operators.”The projet went live some months ago and Clark is proud of how well his technology is performing in some very challenging environmental conditions(the radar was rated to 70℃ before being installed).”
Aside from the fact it’s very hot,there’s also a lot of dust and sand,”he says.”Radar works very well as a detection system ground sensors would struggle.”

回答No.1

siritaiyo_1978

http://www.excite.co.jp/world/

ここで翻訳できますよ。

お礼

ありがとうございました。