英文の訳出上の不明点についての質問（急ぎ）| OKWAVE

英文訳出上の疑問点について教えて下さい

以下の英文の訳出で、わからない箇所がいくつかあるので、教えて下さい。 In my judgment, it's difficult to tell at this juncture whether the optimists or the pessimists are closer to right about when the world will experience peak oil, but the answer is not very important as a determinant of what we need to be doing. After all, it's clear that heavy oil dependence carries substantial economic and political risks in a world where high proportions of the reserves and remaining recoverable resources lie in regions that are unstable and/or controlled by authoritarian governments that have sometimes been inclined to wield oil supply as a weapon. It's also clear that world oil use (which is dominated by the transport sector and, within it, by motor vehicles) is a huge producer of conventional air pollutants, as well as being about equal to coal burning as a contributor to the global buildup of the heat-trapping gas CO2. Given these liabilities, it makes sense to be looking urgently for ways to reduce oil dependence (while working to clean up continuing uses of oil), no matter when we think peak oil might occur under business as usual. この英文の第２センテンスについて、 Q1)前半のAfter all, it's clear that heavy oil dependence carries substantial economic and political risks in a worldまでは理解できるのですが、worldを修飾する関係副詞のwhere以下が、よくわかりません。　まず、high proportions of the reserves のthe reserves とはどう訳したらいいのでしょうか？「原油埋蔵量」のことでしょうか？次に、 remaining recoverable resources の訳ですが、「残存する再生可能資源」でよろしいでしょうか？仮にOKだとして、それでは、「残存する再生可能資源」って、具体的に何のことを言っているのでしょうか？とりあえず、以下のように訳してみたのですが、よろしくお願いします。「結局、重度の石油依存がthe reservesと残存する再生可能資源の高い割合が、不安定かつ、または、時として石油供給を（政治的な）武器として巧みに利用してきた権威（独裁）主義的政府によって支配されてきた地域に存在する世界における実質的な経済的、政治的リスクをもたらしているということは明白である。」結局、筆者が何を言いたいのか？？？模範訳を添えてご解説頂けたら大変助かります。ちなみに原文は、 Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being John P. Holdren The Energy-Economy-Environment Dilemma からの抜粋です。

英文の和訳を教えて下さい。

http://okwave.jp/qa/q7788054.html こちらの英文の続きの文章になります。ダッシュやコンマで繋がり、一文が長いものもあり、良く分かりませんでした。お願いします。 Vanuatu and Hawaii are following the lead of yet another island: Iceland, which amazed the world in 1999 when it announced its intention to become the world’s first hydrogen society. Iceland, which spent $185 million – a quarter of its trade deficit – on oil imports in 2000, has joined forces with Shell Hydrogen, DaimlerChrysler and Norsk Hydro in a multimillion dollar initiative to convert the island’s buses, cars and boats to hydrogen and fuel cells over the next 30 years. In part, the transition to hydrogen energy is fuelled by three of the world’s most pressing energy-related problems: worsening urban air pollution, rising geopolitical instability due to oil import dependence, and accelerating climate change from fossil fuel combustion. Prolonging petroleum and coal reliance in transportation and electricity will increase global carbon emissions from 6.1 to 9.8 billion tons of carbon by 2020. In the absence of alternative energy sources in the market, the use of coal and oil are projected to increase by approximately 30 and 40 per cent, respectively. According to the World Energy Assessment, the accelerated replacement of oil and other fossil fuels with hydrogen could help achieve ‘deep reductions’ in carbon emissions and avoid the doubling of pre-industrial CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere: a level at which scientists expect major and potentially irreversible ecological and economic disruptions, such as sea level rising, coastal flooding, extreme weather events and loss of both biodiversity and agricultural productivity. It is no wonder that islands, stationed on the front lines of both the rising tides of climate change and a vulnerability to high oil prices, are in the vanguard of the hydrogen push.

英文の訳出について

英語史のテキストの中で、以下はピジン語について書かれた部分なのですが、うまく訳せないので力を貸していただきたいです。できれば文構造の解説もしてもらいたいです。 Alongside the standard varieties of English that were in use for official purposes, there also emerged language varieties which sociolinguists call pidgins. A pidgin is a language that arises when two or more different speech communities use their respective languages as the basis for a very basic language with a limited set of functions. よろしくお願いします。

英文の邦訳

The willingness of American corporations to accept the moderate political environment was certainly made easier by the nation's global economic power. When that power began to recede, as it almost inevitably did as the rest of the world began to recover from World War II, it became increasingly necessary for Americans to fight over the spoils of a shrinking pie. 上記英文中，後半のas it almost inevitably did as the rest of the world began to recover from World War II, it became increasingly necessary for Americans to fight over the spoils of a shrinking pie.の部分が上手く訳せません。お分かりになる方，適訳をどうぞ宜しくお願いします。

訳出願い　長文

Comparative Historical Analysis, James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyerからの引用です。下記の部分の和訳が上手くいきません。皆様の知恵をお貸しください。よろしくお願いいたします。 Comparative historical analysis has a long and distinguished history in the social sciences. Those whom we now regard as the founders of modern social science,from Adam Smith to Alexis de Tocqueville to Karl Marx, all pursued comparative historical analysis as a central mode of investigation. In doing so, they continued a tradition of research that had dominated social thought for centuries. Even when social science began to organize itself into separate disciplines in the early twentieth century, comparative and historical investigation maintained a leading position, figuring prominently in the research of such eminent scholars as Otto Hintze, Max Weber, and Marc Bloch. Only by the mid-twentieth century did other approaches to social knowledge partially eclipse comparative historical research, going so far as to threaten its permanent decline. After some period of neglect, however, recent decades have witnessed a dramatic reemergence of the comparative historical tradition. Although important problems of analytic procedure and methodology remain,this mode of investigation has reasserted itself at the center of today’s social sciences. These recent advances derived from earlier developments. By the late 1970s and early 1980s,it was already clear that comparative historical research was experiencing a revival across the social sciences. In her concluding chapter in Vision and Method in Historical Sociology,for example, Theda Skocpol (1984a) pointed out that this kind of research was well beyond its days as an isolated mode of analysis carried out by a few older scholars dedicated to the classical tradition. Now, almost two decades later, few observers would deny that comparative historical research is again a leading mode of analysis, widely used throughout the social sciences. This volume seeks to assess the achievements of comparative historical research over the last thirty years, discuss persistent problems, and explore agendas for the future. we begin that task by delineating the distinctive features of this mode of analysis. We suggest that comparative historical analysis is best considered part of a long-standing intellectual project oriented toward the explanation of substantively important outcomes. It is defined by a concern with causal analysis, an emphasis on processes over time, and the use of systematic and contextualized comparison. In offering this definition, we intentionally exclude other analytical and methodological traits that are often associated with comparative historical analysis but that we do not consider part of its core features. For example, although many comparative historical analyses offer explanations based on social and political structures and their change, the research tradition is not inherently committed to structural explanation or any other single theoretical orientation. Likewise, while most work in the field employs qualitative forms of data analysis, comparative historical analysis is not characterized by any single method of descriptive and causal inference.

英文についての質問です。

Consider Michael Huemer’s “problem of political authority.” Do you agree that this is a problem？という質問がありました。それに対する回答をしようと思い本文中から「Problem of political authority」について述べられているところを探しました。＊＊＊＊ As philosopher Michael Huemer notes, our ethical judgements are inconsistent between evaluating actions by individuals or by governments. Acts that would be considered unjust or morally unacceptable when performed by nongovernmental agents will often be considered perfectly all right, even praiseworthy, when performed by government agents. Huemer calls the special moral status we grant to government the problem of political authority, and argues that such legitimacy is an illusion, that nobody can have a right to rule, nor can anybody have an obligation to obey. ＊＊＊＊質問の回答として「私はこの問題に賛成だ。なぜならヒューマーが述べているように、正当性は誰にも支配権を与えることができないし、誰にも服従する義務を負うことはできないからだ」でいいでしょうか？（英文はまた後ほど、作成して質問するかもしれません）回答内容はこれでいいか（質問の趣旨に合っているか）教えてほしいです。よろしくお願いします。

英文についての質問

　As Nobel prize winning political scientist Elinor Ostrom said, “Conflict isn’t necessarily bad; it’s just how we articulate our differences.” 　It is the means by which we resolve conflict that may be bad, not the mere existence of conflicting interests. We can resolve conflict conflictually, or we can choose to resolve conflict cooperatively. 　The choice of means by which we resolve conflict is, of course, also political, as that choice is the “how” in determining who gets what, when, and how. という英文があるのですが… ・一文目の””内はどういうことでしょうか？「紛争は必ずしも悪いことではない。それは私たちに違いを明確に表してくれる。」でしょうか？；の後の訳し方（何を言いたいのか）がわからないです。・３段落目のThe choice以降は「私たちが紛争を解決する選択はもちろん政治でもあります。それは誰が何をいつ、どこで、どのように得るのかをどのように選択するかだ」という訳であっているでしょうか？ politics is who gets what, when, and, howという文章が前にあったので、それに繋がってくると思うのですが… ややこしくてすみません。よろしくお願いします。

英文についての質問です。

We have instincts and propensities that bear subtle testimony to the universalities of our own environment, and that of our distant ancestors. Some of these instincts, like that for language, are so important that, for all practical purposes, they are unalterable; others are more malleable, and can be partially overwritten, or totally reprogrammed, by experience: they appear as defaults only when cultural influences, or other learned responses, are absent. （ The artful universe by J.D.Barrow） 1）最初の文に出てくるbearの意味がよく取れません。辞書を引いてみたのですが、意味が沢山あってどの意味が適しているのかわかりませんでした。 2）また、最後のthey appear as defaults only when cultural influences, or other learned responses, are absent.の内容が難しく、どういうことを言っているのかがわかりません。 appear as defaults ということは、つまり現れない、ということになるのでしょうか？ theyはinstincts だと思うのですが、 only when cultural influences, or other learned responses, are absent.ここの意味がとりわけわかりません。よろしくお願いします。

訳してください。急ぎです・・・

PAYMENT CONDITION: 2 month rent with deposit is required to be paid and there after monthly by monthly GUARANTY:A guaranty of Receipt will be issued out for the tenant for the Payment and that will be Attached to a copy of the Rental Agreement and the tenant must bring a copy of the Rental Agreement and a copy of the Guaranty of Receipt Fund when coming to move in to the Landlord's Flat. 今、海外に住んでおり、賃貸契約をしようと思っています。上文を訳していただけませんでしょうか。当初わたしは銀行の口座振込みで支払いをした領収書を貼れということかと思ったのですが… どなたかお助けください！

英語　訳出願い

自分で訳したものの、すっきり読めないので、訳出願います。よろしくお願いします。 ’UNDERSTANDING REALITY TELEVISION’の一部です。 As we embark upon a new century of broadcasting, It is clear that no genre form or type of programing has been as actively marketed by producers, or more enthusiastically embraced by viewers, than reality-based TV. This quote seems a pertinent way in which to open a book that seeks to 'understand Reality TV'. It emphasizes how the formats, images, and convention of Reality TV have stitched themselves into the very fabric of television, its economic structures, schedules and viewing cultures. Reality TV has rapidly come to occupy a place at the forefront of contemporary television culture – a position from which it seems to 'speak' particular clearly to the ways in which broadcasters are seeking to attract audiences in the multichannel landscape, the ways in which television is harnessing its aesthetic and cultural power and, as an increasingly multimedia experience, the ways in which it resonates so extensively in the cultural sphere. This collection seeks to respond to the complex, contested and often controversial terrain of 'popular factual programming' (CORNER,2001) with the broad aim of considering its economic, aesthetic, political and cultural implications for understanding contemporary 'television' as an object of study. It is certainly the case that this terrain continued to evolve, shift and change in the process of producing this collection, which thus offers an investigation of the field at a particular point in time (television’s rhetoric of the perpetual present of course always renders stopping the 'flow' an impossibility). At the same time, however, this book also seeks to contribute to the longer-term project of understanding and studying what CORNER has described as television's 'greatly expanded range of popular images of the real'.

下記英文の解釈で質問があります。

http://c.oshiete.goo.ne.jp/oshiete_category.php3?c=385 シルヴァン・シャボーというミュージシャンのインタビューです。 "Touching Down Lightly" is your new album with only one track of 47 minutes. I consider that musicians that create long music's are the ones who really know how to make music. Do you share my thought? That's an interesting point of view, I clearly get what you mean. I used to consider that when a musician composed a very long work, he couldn't do it without a lot of heart and conviction...................................略 It's not a matter of knowing how to make music. It's more about the need: the need to make a piece that can last and to feel powerful enough to do that while you're performing. And this recording was made with heart and conviction. 2段落目の It's more about the need: the need to make a piece that can last and to feel powerful enough to do that while you're performing. この文がいまいちわかりません。構造は、 the need に対してto makeで修飾していて、 pieceを関係代名詞でthat以下で修飾、ですね。 a piece can last そして、次のto feelですが、ここがいまいちわかりません。それとこの文章の意味を教えてください。 ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― あと、単語帳のDuoにあった文章ですが、 A woman passed by me giving off a subtle scent of perfume. この文章ですが、givingの前にwasが入らないのでしょうか？ A woman passed by me was giving off a subtle scent of perfume. なら納得がいくのですが・・・。それともこれは文章ではなく、句なのでしょうか？

以下の英文を訳してくださいませんか？

以下の英文の訳をよろしくお願いします。 The speaker started to say '...is to take issues...', realised that this is an ambiguous phrase and then corrected him/herself by continuing 'it's taken...' (= it has taken)...'and 'it's used...' I see why you might think this is a passive - and if 'it's' = 'it is' you'd be right. But 'it's' can also mean 'it has'. Link to this forum: I don't undrestand the interview... Report message2 Message 3, in reply to message 1. Posted by Robert (U2283314) on Saturday, 9th April 2011 (6 Hours Ago) Well, I'm not an expert, but I see nothing here but present perfect tense. Maybe he/she is talking about a legislature or Parliament. "It's taken issues that apply to everybody (how about the 'federal funds rate' as set by the BoE) and it's used this convention to heighten those things."

英文の和訳をお願いします。

That unique blend of optinism, humility, and the utter confidence that, when the world needs someone to do that, you need an American.

英文を訳して下さい。

In the second edition of The World Crisis (1938), Churchill wrote that the figure of 442,000 was for other ranks and the figure of "probably" 460,000 casualties included officers. Churchill gave a figure of 278,000 German casualties of whom 72,000 were killed and expressed dismay that French casualties had exceeded German by about 3:2. Churchill also stated that an eighth needed to be deducted from his figures for both sides to account for casualties on other sectors, giving 403,000 French and 244,000 German casualties. Grant gave a figure of 434,000 German casualties in 2005. In 2005, Foley used calculations made by Wendt in 1931 to give German casualties at Verdun from 21 February to 31 August 1916 as 281,000, against 315,000 French casualties.

この英文を訳してください！

Concern about health is one of the driving forces behind the rapid expansion of organics,the fastest growing segment of an otherwise Sluggish food industry.In some ways organic has become "a victim of its own success." Agribusiness is swallowing up the very farms that started as a reaction to the industrialization of America's food supply. Small organic farms rebelled against conventional farming methods that relied on Synthetic pesticides and other toxic chemicals that exhaust the soil and pollute water, but there were other aspects to the organic movement that got lost when the U.S. Department of Agriculture established organic standards in 2002. Organic farmers wanted to move away from the large corporate farms that grew only one crop such as corn or WHeat, and return to the old way offarming with various crops and farm animals all coexisting. They envisioned small regional farms supplying Americans with local, seasonal, and natural foods. However, as organic farms grew they started to look a lot like their conventional counterparts, minus the harmful chemicals. Even as critics claim that organic has been "industrialized" and taken over by big business,there is no question that a lot of good has come out of the organic movement. The conversion ofland into organic has been greatforthe environment.It has enabled consumers to have more access to fruits and vegetables grown without pesticides and to meat from animals raised on heal thier feed. However,food still often has to travel thousands of miles from farm to table,the average distance for produce being about 1,500 "food" miles. One researcher, Louise Pape, director of Climate Today,found that wheat traveled 5,110 miles from a farm in Nebraska to a Wal-Martin New Mexico, stopping in four other places on its journey from the field to a box of cake mix. Organic foods are expensive, often requiring a 20 to 50 percent price increase, depending on the product and whether it's in season, and they aren't always available. It can be especially difficult to find certified organic meat. This is all likely to change as Wal-Mart adds a substantial amount of well-priced organic foods to its shelves, much of it packaged organic versions of conventional foods like boxed macaroni and cheese and breakfast cereals. Wal-Mart's appetite for organic will surely resultin the conversion of hundreds of thousands more acres of farmland to organic. The land won't 30 necessarily be in the United States, but it's good news that consumers will have more access to organic. There are also worries about the constant pressure to weaken the organic standards, which will only increase as big business gets more involved. As the meaning of "organic" is Weakened, some farmers go "beyond organic" by using words like "local" and 'sustainable" in reaction to the industrialization of organic. There's no official definition of "sustainable," but it's essentially a way of raising food that's healthy for those who eat it as well as the farms that produce it -the animals, the farmers, and the land itself. Chemical pesticides are minimally used, animals have access to pasture, and the farm itselfis viewed as an extension of the local community. What's taken out of the environment is put back in so that it can be maintained permanently and available to future generations. Local food is fresher, doesn't have to travel thousands of miles to reach you, and is less expensive When you buy it directly from the farmer.It's also better for your local economy. When you choose local you are supporting conservation of fuel resources, economic viability of local communities, freshness, and better taste. Eating locally and in-season foods is also a more traditional way of eating. The disadvantage to local is that unless it's guaranteed to be organic you have to do allthe work yourself to know how it was produced.

英文和訳

If you want to know the truth about gasoline prices, here it is: the exploding demand for oil, especially in places like China, is overwhelming the rate of new discoveries by so much that oil prices are almost certain to continue upward over time no matter what the oil companies promise. And politicians cannot bring gasoline prices down in the short term bygiving more money to oil companies. However, there is one extremely effective way to bring the costs of driving a car way down within a few short years. The way to bring gas prices down is to end our dependence on oil and use the renewable sources that can give us the equivalent of $1 per gallon gasoline and we need to get busy creating that system now. Al・Goreの演説の一部です。どなたか和訳お願いしますm(__)m

英文を訳して下さい。

Finally, Evans argued that it is untrue that Versailles caused the premature end of the Republic, instead contending that it was the Great Depression of the early 1930s that put an end to German democracy. He also argued that Versailles was not the "main cause" of National Socialism and the German economy was "only marginally influenced by the impact of reparations". Ewa Thompson points out that the treaty allowed numerous nations in Central and Eastern Europe to liberate themselves from oppressive German rule, a fact that is often neglected by Western historiography, more interested in understanding the German point of view. In nations that found themselves free as the result of the treaty—such as Poles or Czechs—it is seen as a symbol of recognition of wrongs committed against small nations by their much larger aggressive neighbours. Regardless of modern strategic or economic analysis, resentment caused by the treaty sowed fertile psychological ground for the eventual rise of the Nazi Party.[citation needed] The German historian Detlev Peukert wrote that Versailles was far from the impossible peace that most Germans claimed it was during the interwar period, and though not without flaws was actually quite reasonable to Germany. Rather, Peukert argued that it was widely believed in Germany that Versailles was a totally unreasonable treaty, and it was this "perception" rather than the "reality" of the Versailles treaty that mattered. Peukert noted that because of the "millenarian hopes" created in Germany during World War I when for a time it appeared that Germany was on the verge of conquering all of Europe, any peace treaty the Allies of World War I imposed on the defeated German Reich were bound to create a nationalist backlash, and there was nothing the Allies could have done to avoid that backlash. Having noted that much, Peukert commented that the policy of rapprochement with the Western powers that Gustav Stresemann carried out between 1923 and 1929 were constructive policies that might have allowed Germany to play a more positive role in Europe, and that it was not true that German democracy was doomed to die in 1919 because of Versailles. Finally, Peukert argued that it was the Great Depression and the turn to a nationalist policy of autarky within Germany at the same time that finished off the Weimar Republic, not the Treaty of Versailles. French historian Raymond Cartier states that millions of Germans in the Sudetenland and in Posen-West Prussia were placed under foreign rule in a hostile environment, where harassment and violation of rights by authorities are documented.

和訳の質問です。

和訳の質問です。下記の和訳を教えてください。 (1)It appears that success breeds success, and the world’s top retail locations are cementing their positions as global retail gateways, supporting online, wholesale, franchise and company owned retail distribution for the world’s top brands. (2)Understanding the local opportunities and defining the role of a physical store when establishing affordability of retail space is key and perhaps best illustrated by the spread in prime rents commanded among the world’s top retail destinations. Considering locations that are sought after by mainstream international retail brands as well as locations that are targeted by luxury brands, retail space in New York is the most expensive in the world, with top rents reaching up to US$37,700 per sqm a year. 一文目は、supportingの後がどう繋がるのかわかりません。よろしくお願いいたします。

訳出お願いします。

For a long time Kristin and I have been interested in how films tell stories. We are fascinated by the principles that govern different storytelling traditions. For the sake of simplicity, we have called the principles norms. The term implies a standard craft competence, along with a diminution of collective decistion-making. Norms are preferred alternatives within a tradition. A norm is not single and inflexible law; （＃）it is best seen as a roughly bounded set of options. Within any cluster of norms, there are always different ways to do something. Film scholars occasionally object to the term norm. Doesn't the norm suggest that we want to celebrate the normal and consign the non- or abnormal to some sort of lower status? But we are not suggesting that. Both Kristin and i have studied and praised filmmakers who do things differently. As historians we are simply studying principles of storytelling, as they have crystallized in norms that shape certain filmmaking trends. A researcher who studies norms of height in a population isn't implying that unusually tall or short people are second-class citizens. 長い間、私とクリスティンはどのように映画が物語を伝えるのかということに興味を持っている。私たちは異なる物語を語る様式（伝統）を支配する原則に魅了された。簡略化のため、その原理を基準（標準）と呼びます。共同の意思決定という側面を伴い、その表現は標準的な言語能力の手法という意味を含む。様式（伝統）の中で、基準は代わるものを好む。その基準は、単独で柔軟性のない規範ではない。つまり、おおまかな境界を持つ選択としてみられる。いくつかの基準の中で、いつも何かをするために違う方法で行う。映画学者は時々、normという表現に反対する。normは、私たちが標準（普通）を祝いたい、低い地位へ普通ではないものを渡したいと提案していすか？そうではありません。クリスティンと私は、異なる手法で映画制作者を勉強（研究）し、賞賛してきた。歴史家として、私たちは物語を伝える原理を簡単に研究してきたし、彼らは映画の傾向を形作った基準を結晶化してきた。集団の中の基準を研究している調査員は、普通でない高低がある人は２級市民であるという意味を含まないと言う。 normというのは、the principles that govern different storytelling traditionsということですか？（＃）の部分の文法構造はどうなっているのかの説明もお願いします。

英文についての質問です

What amendment changed the selection of Senators, when did that happen, and how are Senators now selected? という質問に対し、答えになりそうな箇所を探しました。（参考にしたのは１段落目だけです。特に必要なければ２段落目は読んでいただかなくて大丈夫です。） As the country developed a stronger sense of national identity after the Civil War, and as claims of corruption in the selection of Senators grew, the demand for direct election of Senators grew. This was finally achieved with the 17th amendment in 1913. A minority of people still argue that this amendment was a mistake, and that an important check on the federal government was lost when the state legislatures’ representation in Congress was eliminated. But even though the state legislatures are no longer directly represented in the Senate, each state still has equal representation, and are so are still represented as distinct political bodies: Wyoming’s less than 600,000 people and California’s 40 million people have the same voice. Some people argue that this is undemocratic, and see the Senate as illegitimate, while others see it as important to ensure the small states are not dominated by a handful of big states. 答えは「上院議員の直接選挙の要求が高まり、1913年の第１７回改正で変更された。」 The demand for senators' direct elections has risen and it was changed in the 17th amendment in 1913. でいいでしょうか？よろしくお願いします。

英文の訳出上の不明点についての質問（急ぎ）

みんなの回答

お礼 2010/03/01 00:08

お礼 2010/03/01 00:05

関連するQ&A

英文訳出上の疑問点について教えて下さい

英文の和訳を教えて下さい。

英文の訳出について

英文の邦訳

訳出願い　長文

英文についての質問です。

英文についての質問

英文についての質問です。

訳してください。急ぎです・・・

英語　訳出願い

下記英文の解釈で質問があります。

以下の英文を訳してくださいませんか？

英文の和訳をお願いします。

英文を訳して下さい。

この英文を訳してください！

英文和訳

英文を訳して下さい。

和訳の質問です。

訳出お願いします。

英文についての質問です

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

専門家に質問してみよう

英文の訳出上の不明点についての質問（急ぎ）

みんなの回答

お礼 2010/03/01 00:08

お礼 2010/03/01 00:05

関連するQ&A

英文訳出上の疑問点について教えて下さい

英文の和訳を教えて下さい。

英文の訳出について

英文の邦訳

訳出願い 長文

英文についての質問です。

英文についての質問

英文についての質問です。

訳してください。急ぎです・・・

英語 訳出願い

下記英文の解釈で質問があります。

以下の英文を訳してくださいませんか？

英文の和訳をお願いします。

英文を訳して下さい。

この英文を訳してください！

英文和訳

英文を訳して下さい。

和訳の質問です。

訳出お願いします。

英文についての質問です

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

専門家に質問してみよう

訳出願い　長文

英語　訳出願い