どういう意味ですか
下文中の [the result of a rare moment of weakness]
これはどういうことでしょうか。
Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem relies on verifying a conjecture born in the 1950s. The argument exploits a series of mathematical techniques developed in the last decade, some of which were invented by Wiles himself. The proof is a masterpiece of modern mathematics, which leads to the inevitable conclusion that Wiles's proof of the Last Theorem is not the same as Fermat's. Fermat wrote that his proof would not fit into the margin of his copy of Diophantus' Arithmetica, and Wiles's 100 pages of dense mathematics certainly fulfils this criterion, but surely the Frenchman did not invent modular forms, the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture, Galois groups and the Kolyvagin–Flach method centuries before anyone else.
If Fermat did not have Wiles's proof, then what did he have? Mathematicians are divided into two camps. The hard-headed sceptics believe that Fermat's Last Theorem was [the result of a rare moment of weakness] by the seventeenth-century genius. They claim that, although Fermat wrote "I have discovered a truly marvellous proof," he had in fact only found a flawed proof. The exact nature of this flawed proof is open to debate, but it is quite possible that it may have been along the same lines as the work of Cauchy or Lamé.
Other mathematicians, the romantic optimists, believe that Fermat may have had a genuine proof. Whatever this proof might have been, ... ...
お礼
補足
型番はヘルメットに記載ありませんです！ 箱も無いです！ シールドの刻印が頼りなんです。 ヘルメットはヤスリ掛してスプレー缶ふり ピカピカになりました。