Came to here; is unpleasant car society!
I am called a non-four-wheeled person in a four-wheeled person, the people who do not get in people getting into a car in the net.
As for the car, the external diseconomies (nuisance to cause another person a trouble) excel others in luxury goods in spite of luxury goods.
As for the three major harm of the car, "cars increase of the crime by a certain thing" "car murder" (car injury), "passive effluent gas" (aggravation of the peace and order)
There is it, but it is passive effluent gas to become the problem in particular. Nearly 100,000 cases make a hit when they search passive effluent gas in yahoo
If many non-four-wheeled people who are how long think unpleasantly or imagine it, I am easy. In the first place what does the passive effluent gas refer to?
It is defined as follows when I examine it in an online dictionary. "Many carcinogen toxic substances are included in the exhaust gas of the car".
Receiving healthy damage because the person who does not get into a car breathes exhaust gas or being made to breathe exhaust gas. と appears.
According to the person who does not get into a car, it surely understands the effluent gas as well as a smell to come to feel sick.
When "it is poisonous gas, and the effluent gas of the car does 1 liter of gasoline 1,000 yen to automobile tax 1 million a year" in the non-four-wheeled person
There are many saying people. I call such a person a person of unpleasant car (けんしゃか), but increase in the unpleasant cars with the decrease of the four-wheeled person year by year.
There was an opportunity to talk with the president of certain IT company of Tokyo, but it is said that all the members are non-four-wheeled people including a president officer the other day in the company.
In addition, I tell that the four-wheeled person does not adopt it for three years. If hear the reason; because it "makes society better more that a company says"
It is a certain thing. 300,000 people a year die for a car only in Japan. A car is a very dangerous vehicle; and to another person a nuisance
Take. Because you do you no good and much harm, you should make the total abolition for another person only for at least privately-owned car in Japan.
I think that it is only the police and an ambulance, a public bus, an employee of the transportation company to be allowed to get into a car and is good. As for the duties to get into a car in our company
There is not it and does not adopt it because there is the person that an act in a car is an antisocial act again. I talked about と.
