- ベストアンサー
ツタンカーメン殺害容疑者についてのエッセイ
- ツタンカーメン殺害容疑者についてのエッセイを提出するため、証拠や仮説について考察しています。
- Ayeが証拠として挙げられていますが、それだけでは容疑者と断定するには不十分です。
- 物的な証拠が欠如しているため、客観的な証拠が必要です。
- みんなの回答 (1)
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
- ベストアンサー
these evidences such as Aye are vizier, he is commoner and Aye married Ankhesenamenが主語であれば、 these evidences such as Aye is a vizier, he is a commoner and Aye married Ankhesenamen 文章になれてきたら、日本語と同様に同じ単語(evidence とsuch as)を繰り返すことは避ける。 these clues that Aye is a vizier and commoner and married Ankhesenamen are not sufficient evidence to persuade. I readily understand that Aye is the key person in this story. However, these evidences can not support Aye is a suspect (of this crime) because it is lack any physical evidence. はおかしい。 there is a lack of physical evidence. I need some objective things such as his subordinate’s diary to establish my hypothesis. These clues that Aye is a vizier and commoner and married Ankhesenamen are not sufficient evidence to persuade. I readily understand that Aye is the key person in the story. However, not all these things do support Aye can be a suspect because there is a lack of physical footprints. I need some other objective evidences such as his subordinate’s diary to have confidence he is responsible for this crime.
お礼
大変丁寧に教えて頂きありがとうございました また機会がありましたら是非よろしくお願いします <(_ _)>