・Many experts agree that global warming has much to do with the decrease of migrating birds in America.
・Flycatchers return to the Netherlands because of lack of food in West Africa during the summer.
・It seems that flycatchers have found some other good places to raise their children.
・Reforesting in the northeastern part of the U.S. was meant to save migratory birds.
・Human efforts to increase some species can be harmful to a natural ecosystem.
The rising incidence of skin cancer — which grew at an average rate of 3.1% per year between 1992 and 2004 in the United States — reflects a real increase in risk, not just better diagnosis of the condition, researchers report.
The number of patients with skin cancer has increased dramatically in Europe1 and North America2 since the 1950s.
Yet some researchers have argued that the rise may be due to improved screening and reporting of cases.
Epidemiologist Eleni Linos of Stanford University Medical Center in California and her colleagues now report in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology that skin cancer really is on the rise3.
They point out that improved screening preferentially picks up thinner tumours that are more likely to be benign.
Therefore, argues Linos, if the rise is an artefact of better screening then the extra cases seen in those years would have a growing proportion of thin tumours.
After assessing 70,596 previously documented cases of cancer diagnosed between 1992 and 2004 in the United States, they found that there were significantly more cases of tumours of all thicknesses.
よろしくお願いしますヘ(´ω`)ゞ
（ ）に入る英文を教えてください。
1 Though he was an old man, he worked in his field every day.
( )( ) ( ) he was, he worked in his field every day.
2 He was arrested because he had not paid his taxes for ten years.
He was arrested for ( )( ) paid his taxes for ten years.
3 I hope that you will find a good job soon.
( ), you will find a good job soon.
4 昨日新宿で誰に会ったと思いますか。とても驚いたことに、去年ニューヨークで知り合った女の子で した。（英語にして頂けますか？２文目はしてみたのですが、添削してもらえますか？）
To my surpise, she was a girl whom I met in NY last year.
以上です。よろしくお願いいたします。
（ ）に入る英文を教えてください。
1 Though he was an old man, he worked in his field every day.
( )( ) ( ) he was, he worked in his field every day.
2 He was arrested because he had not paid his taxes for ten years.
He was arrested for ( )( ) paid his taxes for ten years.
3 I hope that you will find a good job soon.
( ), you will find a good job soon.
4 昨日新宿で誰に会ったと思いますか。とても驚いたことに、去年ニューヨークで知り合った女の子で した。（英語にして頂けますか？２文目はしてみたのですが、添削してもらえますか？）
To my surpise, she was a girl whom I met in NY last year.
以上です。よろしくお願いいたします。
Rich countries should therefore properly finance the “CG system”, a network of government-backed institutes, carrying out research into rice, wheat, maize and livestock. And the emerging giants should chip in, too. China, India, Brazil and Russia complain that they do not get the respect they deserve. Here is a chance for them to earn it by helping underwrite a global public good. They should contribute to the CG system (as Mexico, to its credit, is doing) and make their national research available more widely. Few things matter to human happiness more than the yields of staple crops.
While the debate over property rights and democracy will doubtless persist, I was taken with an observation made by Amartya Sen , the Nobel Prize winner in economics : “In the terrible history of famines in the world, no substantial famine has ever occurred in any independent and democratic country with a relatively free press. We cannot find exceptions to this rule, no matter where we look.”I agree. With the media in authoritarian regimes tending toward self-censorship, marker interventionist policies-the most prevalent cause of disrupted distribution of food-go unreported and uncorrected until too late.
1)Hurricanes, house fires, cancer, plane crashes, vicious attacks in dark places. Nobody asks for any of it. But to their surprise, many people find that enduring such a hardship ultimately changes them for the better. They might say something like this: "I wish it hadn't happened, but I'm a better person for it."
(2)We love to hear the stories of people who have been transformed by their suffering, perhaps because they testify to a psychological truth, one that sometimes gets lost amid endless reports of disaster: There is a natural human capacity to flourish under the most difficult circumstances. Positive reactions to profoundly disturbing experiences are not limited to the toughest or the bravest. In fact, roughly half the people who struggle with hardship say that their lives have in some ways improved.
(3)This and other promising findings about the life-changing effects of crises are part of the new science of post-traumatic growth. This field has already proved the truth of what once passed as common saying: What doesn't kill you can actually make you stronger. Post-traumatic stress is far from the only possible outcome. In the wake of even the most terrifying experiences, only a small proportion of adults become troubled. More commonly, people rebound—or even eventually flourish.
(4)Those who survive hardship well are living proof of one of the paradoxes of happiness: We need more than pleasure to live the best possible life. Our contemporary quest for happiness has become a hunt for bliss—a life protected from bad feelings, free from pain and confusion.
(5)This definition of well-being leaves out the better half of the story, the rich, full joy that comes from a meaningful life. It is the dark matter of happiness, the quality we admire in wise men and women and aspire to cultivate in our own lives. It turns out that some of the people who have suffered the most, who have been forced to contend with shocks they never anticipated and to rethink the meaning of their lives, may have the most to tell us about that profound and intensely fulfilling journey that philosophers used to call the search for "the good life."
(6)This broader definition of good living blends deep satisfaction and a profound connection to others through sympathy. It is dominated by happy feelings but seasoned also with nostalgia and regret. "Happiness is only one among many values in human life," contends Laura King, a psychologist at the University of Missouri in Columbia. Compassion, wisdom, insight, creativity—sometimes only the trials of hardship can foster these qualities, because sometimes only drastic situations can force us to take on the painful process of change. To live a full human life, a quiet, carefree existence is not enough. We also need to grow—and sometimes growing hurts.
Instead of blaming all of them for the violence against women, we were asking them to help us deal with the men they knew who came into the bar or the gym, boasting about using violence against women.
とある大学入試英文の１文であります。
このwhoの先行詞はthe men と思いますが、これは連鎖関係詞と呼ばれるものですか？それだったらwhoはthe menの直後に来るべきだと思いますが、どうですか？
they knewは挿入ですかね。それだと両端にコンマがいるはず。
お願いします。
英語のリスニングを鍛える為、作業中に流しっぱなしにできる米国のインターネットラジオ番組を探しています。
現在は英国BBCのインターネットラジオを流しっぱなしにしていますが、米国のラジオでこのように流しっぱなしにできる番組はありませんでしょうか？
Voice of America や CNN などは1コンテンツの時間が短く、終わるたびにクリックして再生しないといけないので、BBCのようにずっと流れているものがあればいいなと思っています。
できれば、ニュースなどの内容で英語があまり得意でない人がリスニングのトレーニングに使えそうなインターネットラジオがありましたら教えて頂けますと幸いです。
よろしくお願いいたします。
上手く訳せないので、英訳お願いします。
These disciplines are founded on the ordinary common-sense recognition that the behavior of individuals, and what happens in the social world, is powerfully affected by the way individual people are ’collectivized’, that is, by the ways they come to be in similar circumstances of one kind or another.
Everyone understands that how people are collective makes a difference to how they are likely to act and what they are likely to think, and that knowing these things helps us when we have to deal with them.
これらの分野は、つまり、個人の振る舞いは、個々の人間は”集合化される”という方法により、つまり、様々な種類の環境において、人間は存在するようになるという方法により、強力に影響されるという普通で共通の認識に基づいている。
全ての人は、いかに集合化された人々が、彼らが考えそうなことや彼かがいかに行動しそうかということに対して理解し、そして、彼らを扱わなければ行けない時、これらを知っていることが私たちを助けるかということを理解している。
上手く訳せないので、英訳お願いします。
These disciplines are founded on the ordinary common-sense recognition that the behavior of individuals, and what happens in the social world, is powerfully affected by the way individual people are ’collectivized’, that is, by the ways they come to be in similar circumstances of one kind or another.
Everyone understands that how people are collective makes a difference to how they are likely to act and what they are likely to think, and that knowing these things helps us when we have to deal with them.
これらの分野は、つまり、個人の振る舞いは、個々の人間は”集合化される”という方法により、つまり、様々な種類の環境において、人間は存在するようになるという方法により、強力に影響されるという普通で共通の認識に基づいている。
全ての人は、いかに集合化された人々が、彼らが考えそうなことや彼かがいかに行動しそうかということに対して理解し、そして、彼らを扱わなければ行けない時、これらを知っていることが私たちを助けるかということを理解している。
